🔗 Share this article

Across several weeks, threatening phone calls persisted. Initially, reportedly from an ex-law enforcement official and an ex-military commander, later from law enforcement directly. Finally, Mohammad Khurshid Shaikh asserts he was summoned to law enforcement headquarters and instructed bluntly: remain silent or face serious consequences.

Shaikh is one of many fighting a multimillion-dollar redevelopment plan where Dharavi – a massive informal community with rich history – is scheduled to be demolished and modernized by a corporate giant.

"The distinctive community of this area is exceptional in the world," states Shaikh. "But the plan aims to eradicate our social fabric and prevent our protests."

Opposing Environments

The narrow alleys of this community present a dramatic difference to the soaring skyscrapers and luxury apartments that overshadow the neighborhood. Dwellings are assembled randomly and often without proper sanitation, small-scale operations produce dangerous fumes and the environment is permeated by the overpowering odor of uncovered waste channels.

For certain residents, the promise of the slum's redevelopment into a modern district of premium apartments, organized recreational areas, contemporary malls and residences with multiple bathrooms is an optimistic future achieved.

"We don't have proper healthcare, proper streets or drainage and there's nowhere for children to play," says a chai seller, fifty-six, who relocated from his home state in 1982. "The single option is to tear it all down and construct proper housing."

Local Protest

But others, including Shaikh, are resisting the plan.

None deny that Dharavi, consistently overlooked as unauthorized settlement, is desperately requiring financial support and improvement. Yet they are concerned that this initiative – without public consultation – could potentially transform premium city property into a luxury development, evicting the disadvantaged, working-class residents who have been there since the nineteenth century.

These were these marginalized, displaced people who built up the vacant wetlands into a widely studied marvel of local enterprise and economic productivity, whose production is worth between a significant amount and a substantial sum a year, making it a major informal economies.

Displacement Concerns

Of the roughly one million inhabitants living in the crowded 220-hectare area, less than 50% will be qualified for new homes in the redevelopment, which is estimated to take a significant period to accomplish. Others will be moved to wastelands and saline fields on the remote edges of the metropolis, risking divide a long-established social network. A portion will receive no homes at all.

Residents permitted to stay in the area will be given units in high-rise buildings, a substantial change from the natural, collective approach of living and working that has maintained the community for generations.

Businesses from garment work to clay work and recycling are projected to decrease in quantity and be relocated to an allocated "commercial zone" separated from people's residences.

Existential Threat

For those such as Shaikh, a craftsman and long-time of his family to reside in this community, the project presents an existential threat. His rickety, three-floor facility makes garments – tailored coats, premium outerwear, decorated jackets – sold in premium stores in south Mumbai and overseas.

His family resides in the accommodations underneath and laborers and sewers – migrants from north India – reside in the same building, allowing him to afford their labour. Outside the slum, accommodation prices are typically significantly costlier for minimal space.

Threats and Warning

Within the government offices in the vicinity, an illustrated mock-up of the transformation initiative depicts an alternative perspective. Fashionable people move around on two-wheelers and e-vehicles, purchasing continental bread and pastries and socializing on a patio outside Dharavi Cafe and treat station. This depicts a stark contrast from the affordable idli sambar morning meal and low-cost tea that maintains the neighborhood.

"This represents no improvement for residents," explains the protester. "This constitutes a huge real estate deal that will price people out for us to survive."

There is also skepticism of the business conglomerate. Managed by a prominent businessman – a leading figure and an associate of the Indian prime minister – the corporation has encountered allegations of favoritism and financial impropriety, which it rejects.

Even as administrative bodies labels it a partnership, the corporation invested a significant amount for its controlling interest. A lawsuit stating that the project was questionably assigned to the corporation is being considered in India's supreme court.

Ongoing Pressure

Since they began to publicly resist the development, protesters and community members assert they have been faced ongoing efforts of pressure and threats – including phone calls, direct threats and insinuations that criticizing the development was comparable with opposing national interests – by individuals they allege work for the developer.

Part of the group suspected of issuing the threats is {a retired police officer|a former law enforcement official|an ex-c