🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Premium health services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who understands all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Selecting the right medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands advanced expertise in medical insurance.

The Medical System Is More Than Complex, It Is Expensive

According to recent research, the average family spends $27,000 each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is expected to exceed $17,000 for each worker by 2026, an increase of 9.5% compared to 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down because partisan disputes regarding tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Will We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate a national health insurance program here in America? I'm convinced we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not suggesting government-run medicine. I'm proposing that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, an employee making moderate income pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you compare it to what the typical American pays. I know dozens of businesses who are routinely paying between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages for medical benefits. Remember that in comprehensive systems, these contributions include pension plans, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting medical services. When you add these expenses compared with our current spending for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to many federal defense, technology, social programs and infrastructure, the program could be managed by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for superior coverage. It would make administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, rather than individual transactions to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would enable simpler for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would be a better understanding of coverage among workers – as opposed to existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in our lives, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone through a national insurance system strengthens economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses which hire the majority of American employees and generate half the economic output. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with rising medical expenses experienced recently, it's evident that the Affordable Care Act is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes that would be incurred, would remain a superior and more affordable approach for not only controlling healthcare costs but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. We rank well below many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances is that we take serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.